F is for Fifty Shades of Grey

50 shades

Yes, I’m actually going there, or at least partly. I have not read Fifty Shades nor have I seen the movie. I know only that it started out as fan fiction for Twilight, it was turned into a book that explores a BDSM lifestyle (of some sort), and has generated billions of dollars between the three books and now the movie that opened last week.

Why have I decided not to read the books or see the movie? Originally I was turned off by all the hoopla touting the books. Especially after hearing multiple times that the books were not well written. That may be the biggest turn off for me, no matter the subject matter. And I admit to a certain curiosity about them. I love a good erotic novel and I’m interested in reading about the BDSM lifestyle—I’ve even written a little bit about it as well. But that the writing might not be good now turns me off more than anything about a book.

Interestingly enough, I’ve heard the same thing about the Twilight series. And I have read that series actually, multiple times. My daughter was a big fan and wanted me to read it. I found the characters fascinating and the plot kept me turning pages and engaged throughout. Of course, I read it before I became a writer in 2009. Since then I have not re-read it, because I’ve become more aware of what is good or bad in a writing style and I didn’t want to be disappointed, although I have watched the movies and enjoyed them many times. So the plot and characters do hold up, it seems.

Still, I am intrigued by Fifty Shades. My daughter, the one who loved Twilight, has both read the Fifty Shades books and seen the movie. When I asked her how it was she said pretty good, but her concern was that a lot of the scenes had been cut and she hated the fact that Ana seemed less intelligent than in the book. As for the sex scenes, she said there was a lot of talking during those scenes in the movie theatre. When I asked her why, she said otherwise it would have been like watching porno with 60 other people. I somehow think that was not the intent of the film, but now I fear that I will have to see it just to judge for myself.

Fifty Shades of Grey has also sparked a huge sea of jokes poking fun at the books. My favorite one, which is a cartoon, I find to be just a whole lot of fun. Hope you enjoy it too.

50 shadeso f hay

And by the way, how do you weigh in on Fifty Shades?

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Jenna Jaxon, Reading and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to F is for Fifty Shades of Grey

  1. I haven’t read the books for pretty much the same reason—turned off by the poor writing. I actually, though Amazon’s look inside, read the first few pages and after the second page, all I could think was “Yep, that book will be tossed across the room.” lol. More than that, I don’t really read erotic novels. Not to say they are bad, they just aren’t my go to genre. I also have no interest in seeing the movies. I’ve read the actors actually can’t stand each other and are regretting signing on for the movie, but who knows if those reports are true.

    • Jenna Jaxon says:

      Thank you, Angela, for reminding me I can take a look at the first few pages of 50 Shades. I might do that, just to give it a try. I’ve read some books that were not very well written and survived, but they were mostly historical which is what I am most interested in and most forgiving of. And yes, I think you have to consider the rumor mill that is the movie industry, although I can see being “seduced” into taking the role and then realizing it wasn’t something you really wanted to do.

    • I love historical too. Probably why I chose that genre to write. 🙂 Happy reading the first few pages! lol.

  2. I was told that the writing would drive me crazy, also I am not into BDSM at all. So no book and no movie.

    • Jenna Jaxon says:

      I am rather saddened that I’ve gotten so picky about the writing. I obviously have enjoyed books with less than wonderful writing before. But learning what not to do has spoiled me in a way. I have to call writers on it when they misbehave. 🙂

  3. melissakeir says:

    I saw the movie for the local radio movie review show I do. It was okay… nothing super special. I thought Dakota Johnson did a great job. She was witty, almost poking fun at the silly storyline. However, Jamie Dorran was horrible as Christian. He was too whiny, young and just not sexy.

    • Jenna Jaxon says:

      This is always the problem with casting a movie from a book that everyone just know’s what the hero or heroine should look/be like. It’s dreadfully hard to live up to the expectation. I was so concerned when they cast Outlander that Jamie wouldn’t be right. They lucked out and cast it all perfectly. That’s really rare these days.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s